Raj Kumar Singh And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52939 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2012 Thana- BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.
Raj Kumar Singh, Son of Daya Shankar Singh 2.
Daya Shankar Singh, Son of Late Ram Ashish Singh 3.
Parvati Devi, Wife of Sri Daya Shankar Singh All resident of Village- Nuaon, P.S.-Krishan Braham, District-Buxar ... ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Shobha Devi, Wife of Raj Kumar Singh, D/o Shivaraman Singh, Resident of Village-Nawadaven, P.S.-Udawant Nagar, District-Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== With CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 52341 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2014 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.
Raj Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Daya Shankar Singh 2.
Daya Shankar Singh, Son of late Ram Ashish Singh 3.
Parvati Devi, Wife of Sri Daya Shankar Singh All resident of Village- Nuaon, P.S.-Krishna Braham, District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Shobha Devi, Wife of Raj Kumar Singh, D/o Shiva Raman Singh, Resident of Village Nawadaven, P.S.- Udawant Nagar, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 52939 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. S. Ehteshamuddin, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 52341 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2024 None turned up on behalf of the petitioners on repeated calls even when the matter was taken on board on second occasion at 4:00 P.M.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52939 of 2016(4) dt.09-05-2024 2/2
2. Learned APP for the State is present.
3. It appears that the petitioners have lost their interest in prosecution.
4. These applications are dismissed in want of prosecution.
Sanjeet/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) U T