Ajay Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36645 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2020 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== AJAY RAM Son of Mahesh Ram Resident of Village - Kotwa Vriti Tola, P.S.- Kotwa, Dist.- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-08-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Kotwa P.S. Case No. 90 of 2020 corresponding to NDPS Case No. 19 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 15(C), 18(B), 21(C), 20 and 22 of the Narcoric Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

Earlier the bail application of petitioner was rejected vide order dated 23.03.2021.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that charge has already been framed on 08.03.2021. Petitioner is in custody since 28.03.2020 having clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36645 of 2021(2) dt.11-08-2021 2/2 Considering the period of custody and progress of trial, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Kotwa P.S. Case No. 90 of 2020 corresponding to NDPS Case No. 19 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below. (ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T