Renu Rai @ Renu Devi v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21645 of 2018 (2) dt.18-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.21645 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2017 Thana -WARISNAGAR District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================
1. RENU RAI @ RENU DEVI W/o Bijo Rai, R/o Village- Chandauli, P.S.- Warisnagar, District- Samastipur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhoy Kumar Kashyap, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Narendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Warisnagar Police Station Case No. 57 of 2017 (G.R. No. 648 of 2017), disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is a lady of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner had been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 12.09.2017 in Cr. Misc. No. 37357 of 2017. Again, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner has been made on the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21645 of 2018 (2) dt.18-04-2018 ground that several co-accused have been granted regular bail in Cr. Misc. No. 36415 of 2017 by the High Court. Hence, the petitioner, who happens to be a mother of two child, seeks sympathetical view of this Court and prays for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find any fresh ground to entertain the second prayer of this petitioner, accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of this petitioner is rejected.
However, it is observed that if the petitioner surrenders before the court below and prays regular bail, the learned court below will consider the prayer for regular bail of this petitioner preferably on the same day on the basis of material available on record.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T