Santu Chaurasiya @ Santu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.39448 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2016 Thana -KAUAKOL District- NAWADA ====================================================== Santu Chaurasiya @ Santu Kumar Son of Lakshman Chaurasiya Resident of Village - Rani Bazar (Kawakole), Police Station - Kawakole, District - Nawada.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-12-2017 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 22 of 2016, registered under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada. The accusation is that the marriage of sister of the informant was performed with Santu Chaurasiya before eight years, but she was being tortured for demand of cash. On 18.02.2016, the informant received informant about death of his sister, then he went to her matrimonial house and came to know that after committing the murder of her sister dead body has been removed from the house and all the in-laws left the house after
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39448 of 2017 (4) dt.14-12-2017 2/2 locking the door.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the husband of the deceased. Further submission is that, in fact, after quarrel deceased left the house and thereafter, her dead body was found on the next day in the field i.e. 2 kilometers away the house of the petitioner. Further submission is that in Post-mortem report no any external injury was found on the person of deceased.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T