Md. Karim @ Bikau Mian v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27417 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2019 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== Md. Karim @ Bikau Mian S/o Md. Azim Resident of Village- Atwarpur, Simoula, P.S.- Lalganj, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Roy For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 29-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 33 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is said to have assaulted in the stomach of the son of the informant by means of knife. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to property dispute and business rivalry as both are running the business of Meat. The petitioner has also filed informatory petition against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27417 of 2019(3) dt.29-07-2019 2/2 informant preceding to the case under hand. Though the doctor has found stitched wound on the abdomen of the victim, but the nature of injury sustained by the victim has not been mentioned in the injury report and is also not found figured in the impugned order. The parties have entered into compromise in the case, hence, he may be enlarged on bail.
Learned counsel for the informant also submitted that the parties have entered into compromise in the case. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer is rejected.
However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below within six weeks and seeks regular bail and learned court below shall pass order on the very date of surrender by the petitioner in accordance with law considering the facts and circumstances of the case without being prejudiced by this order.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) rohit/- U T