← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26419/2025bail granted

Birendra Kumar @ Birendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-14Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26419 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2019 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Birendra Kumar @ Birendra Yadav S/o- Ram Ashray Singh Resident of village- Teri Pokhraha PS- Barun District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary cum Mines Commissioner and Geology Dept. Govt. of Bihar, Patna Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uma Kant Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 353, 333, 379, 420, 411, 504, 506, 427, 341, 147, 149 and 186 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 4 and 40 of the Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules and Section 15 of Environment Protection Act.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that when the informant along with other police officers reached near the house of Bhola Singh, some 200 persons assembled there and when they tried to stop the lifting of sand, then all the accused persons started throwing stone pieces upon the police party.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26419 of 2025(2) dt.14-07-2025 2/2

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The FIR has been lodged against 19 named and 150 unknown persons. Petitioner is said to have been identified in the light of torch and the vehicle light. There is general and omnibus allegation and no specific allegation has been levelled against him. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering backdrop of the case, nature of accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad (Bihar) in connection with Barun P. S. Case No. 86 of 2019, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T