Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30069/2026bail granted

Pandav Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-08Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30069 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-870 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== Pandav Paswan S/O Buttan Paswan Resident of Village- Vishwambhar Chak, P.S.- Amarpur, Dist.- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2026 Heard Mr.Pankaj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 05.12.2025 in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 870 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 04.12.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2),115(2),109(1),74,303(2),352 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted to the father of the informant by means of Axe, due to which he sustained injury thereafter the petitioner has also assaulted to the mother of the informant by means of iron rod.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. Although there

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30069 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/3 is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted to the father of the informant by means of Axe and he has received the injury and thereafter the petitioner has also assaulted to the mother of the informant by means of iron rod. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no intention to kill anyone and due to spur of moment the present occurrence has taken place and injury report of the injured persons suggests that the injuries are simple in nature. There is case and counter case and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner has clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 870 of 2025, with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30069 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 3/3 on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T