← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/24611/2013withdrawn

Mahendra Mishra And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-07-21Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24611 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Mahendra Mishra Son Of Late Bindeshwari Mishra Resident Of Village Borpa Tole, Mishra Bigha, P.S.- Pauthu In The District Of Aurangabad

2. Ashok Mishra Son Of Late Bindeshwari Mishra Resident Of Village Borpa Tole, Mishra Bigha, P.S.- Pauthu In The District Of Aurangabad

3. Kalawati Devi Wife Of Mritunjay Mishra Resident Of Village Borpa Tole, Mishra Bigha, P.S.- Pauthu In The District Of Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Home Department Cum Designated Authority, Bihar, Patna

3. The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad, Bihar

5. The Superintendent Of Police, Aurangabad, Bihar

6. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Aurangabad Sub Division, Bihar

7. The Land Reformer Development Commissioner, Aurangabad

8. The Circle Officer, Rafiganj, Aurangabad

9. The Inspector Of Police, Rafiganj Circle, District- Aurangabad

10. The Officer-In-Charge, P.S.- Pauthu, District- Aurangabad .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 21-07-2016 Heard both sides.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, after making submission at some length, sought permission of the Court to withdraw this writ application enabling the petitioners to assail the order passed by the respondent Sub-Divisional Police Officer in appeal before the appropriate authority in accordance with law. It is also submitted that the petitioners

Patna High Court CWJC No.24611 of 2013 (2) dt.21-07-2016 2/2 while filing the appeal would seek condonation of delay on the ground that they had been pursuing their remedy before this Court bonafidely.

The application is permitted to be withdrawn with the said liberty.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U