Ram Babu Yadav @ Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27967 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2019 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ram Babu Yadav @ Aman Kumar S/o Harendra Yadaav @ Kowar @ Kuwar Resident of Village-Kauludehri, P.S.-Chenari, District-Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kamla Kant Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2020 Learned counsel of the petitioner assures this court that he shall remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks from the date when the court starts physical function.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State through video conference.
Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 04.10.2019 in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 176 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 400, 402, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Although, petitioner is said to be caught on the spot but nothing was recovered from his conscious possession.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27967 of 2020(2) dt.07-12-2020 2/2 Moreover, having similar allegation, one co-accused has already been granted privilege of bail.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail provisionally till removal of the defects, as pointed out by the office, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-XIII, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sessions Trial No. 496 of 2019 arising out of Chenari P.S. Case No. 176 of 2019.
It is made clear that if the defects, as pointed out by the office, are removed within the above stated period, the provisional bail of the petitioner shall be deemed to be confirmed.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) shahzad/- U T