Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9232/2018allowed

Pappu Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-20Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9232 of 2018 (2) dt.20-02-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9232 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -128 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVINDPUR District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Pappu Chaudhary S/o Biru Chaudhary @ Virbal Chaudhary @ Viraal Chaudhary @.., R/o Village- Govindpur Dih, P.S.- Govindpur, DistrictNawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rina Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rana Randhir Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Govindpur Police Station Case No. 128 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not involve in dealing of illegal liquor as alleged in the F.I.R. Hence, the petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9232 of 2018 (2) dt.20-02-2018 let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-II - cum- Special Judge, Nawada in connection with Govindpur Police Station Case No. 128 of 2017, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T