Shweta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26732 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2026 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.
Shweta Kumari D/o Rana Singh Resident of Village- Nirpur, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria.
2.
Rana Singh S/o Late Lalu Singh Resident of Village- Nirpur, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria.
3.
Kiran Devi W/o Rana Singh Resident of Village- Nirpur, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria.
4.
Chhotu @ Rahul Kumar S/o Rana Singh Resident of Village- Nirpur, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria.
5.
Sumit Kumar S/o Rana Singh Resident of Village- Nirpur, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Aman Kumari D/o Ganesh Patel, Resident of Malpa ward no. 3, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 27-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The accused/petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Chautham P.S. Case No. 77 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 64(1), 351(2), 351(3),3(5) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita.
3. As per FIR, petitioners alleged to involved in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26732 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 2/3 demanding dowry from the informant as to accept her their family members/daughter-in-law. It is also alleged that the son of petitioner nos. 2 and 3, namely Gaurav Kumar, who is not the petitioner for the present established physical relationship on several occasion on false pretext of marriage.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are the family members and parents of the named co-accused Gaurav Kumar, against whom the thrust of allegation qua establishing physical relationship is available. It is pointed out that the allegation against petitioners are very much general and omnibus in nature in the background of dowry demand, which appears raised with harassing attitude. In this context, it is further submitted that subsequently matter compromised between the parties and in support of his submission, attention of this Court was drawn towards Annexure-2.
5. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted that petitioners are involved in one more criminal case, where they are on bail which was lodged by his agnate.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26732 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 3/3
6. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.
7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of the fact as the thrust of allegation is available against co-accused Gaurav Kumar, where petitioners prima facie appears implicated being immediate family members, accordingly, all five above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Khagaria/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Chautham P.S. Case No. 77 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T