Triloki Yadav @ Trilok Yadav @ Trilok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57920 of 2015 (2) dt.10-03-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57920 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2015 Thana -KUMARGHAND District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Triloki Yadav @ Trilok Yadav @ Trilok Kumar Son of Chandeshwari yadav Resident of Village- Jamuaha, P.s Kumarkhand, District Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Rajendra Pd.Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kumarkhand P.S. Case No. 80 of 2015 pending in the Court of ACJM, Madhepura for the offences instituted under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case in short is that on 30.06.2015 the informant closed his shop and proceeded towards his house by his bike, in the meantime, two miscreants came out from bush and on the point of weapons, stopped him and snatched his Samsung mobile and miscreants fled away from the place of occurrence. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57920 of 2015 (2) dt.10-03-2016 no material except for suspicion against the petitioner. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from the possession of the petitioner.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the name of the petitioner has come in course of the investigation and has actively participated in the alleged occurrence. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the above named petitioner on anticipatory bail, the same is rejected.

Anyhow, if the petitioner surrenders in the court below within a period of four weeks, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. (Sudhir Singh, J) B.Kr./- U T