Lal Babu Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28065 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2021 Thana- TARIYANI CHAPRA PS DistrictSheohar ====================================================== Lal Babu Ray Son of Late Sonaul Ray R/O- Village- Ganga Dharampur, P.S.- Tariyani Chhapra, Dist-Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Gaytri Devi Wife of Lalan Ray R/O- Village- Ganga Dharampur, P.S.- Tariyani Chhapra, Dist-Sheohar 3.
Brajesh Kumar Son of Lalan Ray R/O- Village- Ganga Dharampur, P.S.- Tariyani Chhapra, Dist-Sheohar 4.
Dilip Kumar Son of Ram Swarth Ray R/O- Village- Ganga Dharampur, P.S.- Tariyani Chhapra, Dist-Sheohar 5.
Santosh Kumar Son of Raw Swarth Ray R/O- Village- Ganga Dharampur, P.S.- Tariyani Chhapra, Dist-Sheohar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Hari Kishore Thakur, Adv.
For the State :
Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-06-2022 Heard Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Md. Aslam Ansari for the State. The petitioner seeks cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party nos. 2 to 5 by order dated 12.04.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2989 of 2022.
Mr. Thakur has very fairly submitted that there is no fault in the order granting anticipatory bail to the opposite party nos. 2 to 5 but, on a false pretext of marriage in the family, the case was up-listed and the order was passed in such case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28065 of 2022(2) dt.22-06-2022 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioner has received information through his client that no marriage took place in the family of the opposite party nos. 2 to 5.
There could be myriad reasons for the marriage not being performed and may be perhaps for the reason of the criminal case against the members of the family, the other party may have chosen not to enter into any matrimonial alliance. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order granting anticipatory bail to the opposite party nos. 2 to 5.
There is no merit in this petition and no good reason has been assigned for cancelling the bail granted to the opposite party nos. 2 to 5.
Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J) rishi/- U T