Suraj Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.40278 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2017 Thana -SULTANGANJ District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Suraj Yadav, Son of Ragho Yadav,
2. Tempo Yadav, Son of Dipali Yadav, Both are R/o Village- Mirhatti, P.S.- Sultanganj, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 8 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 324, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
As per written report there is specific allegation of causing firearm injury against co-accused Dipali Yadav. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40278 of 2017 (2) dt.21-09-2017 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 8 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T