Md. Shahid @ Shahid v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28668 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2024 Thana- R S P.S. District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Md. Shahid @ Shahid S/O Late Elias R/O Vill.- Murballah, Ward no. 1, P.S.- Araria R.S., Dist.- Araria.

2.

Bibi Sambari @ Sabri @ Sanobar @ Sonabar W/O Md. Shahid R/O Vill.- Murballah, Ward no. 1, P.S.- Araria R.S., Dist.- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State along with learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), (115(2), 118(1), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3, 3(5) of BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that petitioner no.2 is wife of petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.1 is alleged to have assaulted the informant with farsha causing injury on head, while Sabri is alleged to have assaulted with Dab on the head of the informant's mother causing injury. It is further submitted that on account of dispute relating to construction of pillar, an altercation had taken place in which both side assaulted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28668 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/2 each other. It is further submitted that no doubt the petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the informant and his mother but the the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature causing by hard and blunt substance, as would manifest from Annexure-3 and 4 to the anticipatory bail application. It is also submitted that petitioners are not criminals.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Araria R.S. Police Station Case No.151/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T