Amit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25613 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Amit Yadav S/O Sri Ravindra Yadav R/O Village- Indarwa Abdullah, P.SGopalganj, Distt.- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Navjot Yeshu, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2025 1.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Gopalganj PS case no. 08 of 2025 dated 05.01.2025, disclosing offences punishable under Sections 126(2) and allied sections of B.N.S. Act.
3.
The prosecution story, as per the First Information Report, is that on 30.12.2024 at about 6 pm, when the informant was on his way to his old house, accused persons including the petitioner started abusing him and threatening him on the pretext that the informant has lodged a case against their friends. It is alleged that petitioner inflicted on the right chest of the informant as also on his right stomach with the knife. Other accused persons also assaulted him. When the family members
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25613 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/2 of the informant intervened, all accused persons escaped away by giving threatening to kill the informant.
4.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. Learned counsel further submits that F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of about 06 days and that too without any plausible explanation. The petitioner is stated to be having clean antecedent.
5.
Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner inflicted knife blow on the vital part of the body and injury sustained is grievous in nature, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.
This application is, accordingly, rejected.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) rinkee/- U T