Ajay Verma @ Ajay Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36376 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2016 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Ajay Verma @ Ajay Kumar Verma Son of Munindra Prasad Verma@Muni Lal Prasad Resident of Mohalla- Chandmari, Police station - Motihari Town, District East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

In this application for anticipatory bail the petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Turkaulia P.S. Case No. 118 of 2016 for the offences punishable under sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 475 and 477 (A) of the I.P.C.

Allegedly, the petitioner and other co-accused being Branch Manager of North Bihar Gramin Bank opened K.C.C loan account in the name of the complainant and the witnesses and grabbed the loan amount.

Submission is of false implication and that the complainant and the witnesses have taken loan under K.C.C.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36376 of 2016 (7) dt.31-01-2017 2/3 scheme, they have made transactions by depositing the amount and withdrawing the amount but only with a view to grab the loan amount the complainant has filed complaint case on the basis of which this case has been registered, during investigation it has come that in the name of the complainant KCC-254 was sanctioned by the Branch Manager Nashim Akhtar, co-accused, on 07.12.2007 and the complainant has made transaction from 08.12.2007 to 17.09.2012, similarly in the name of the witnesses also K.C.C. loan has been sanctioned and the witnesses have made transactions in the said account and this falsifies that the loan amount was grabbed by the petitioner and other co-accused, during investigation it has also come that to grab the loan amount the complainant has filed this case, vide paragraph-41 of the case diary, and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that during investigation vide paragraphs- 21 and 41 it has come that the petitioner has been falsely implicated.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner, in case of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36376 of 2016 (7) dt.31-01-2017 3/3 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of. C.J.M. Motihari in connection with above mentioned case, subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T