Rajeshwari Kumari Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19675 of 2010 ====================================================== Rajeshwari Kumari Gupta, wife of Sri Vijay Kumar, resident of MohallaBirpur Main Road, Ward No.-6, P.S. Birpur, District-Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through its Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Supaul

4. The District Superintendent of Education, Supaul

5. Member, the District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority, Supaul

6. The Block Development Officer, Nirmali, District- Supaul

7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Nirmali, District- Supaul

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat- Bela Singar Moti, BlockNirmali, District- Supaul

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat-Bela Singar Moti, Block-Nirmali, District- Supaul

10. Anita Kumari, wife of Sri Sunil Kumar Yadav, Resident of villageBela Singar Moti, P.O. Didhiya, P.S. Nirmali, District- Supaul ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Smt. Shashi Priya Pathak, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 19-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

In view of the fact that the State Appellate Authority is now functional, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.

Permission is granted.

In case the petitioner files an appeal before the State

Patna High Court CWJC No.19675 of 2010(10) dt.19-06-2018 2/2 Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today along with a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is required to decide the appeal on its own merit after condoning the delay in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the writ petition for the same relief before this Court.

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Until disposal of the appeal by the State Appellate Authority, the interim order passed on 6.12.2010 shall continue. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U