Patna High CourtMJC/104/2016disposed

Om Prakash Thakur And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Binay Kumar Principal Secretary Rural Works Department Govt. Of Bihar

2017-02-10Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.104 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3628 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Om Prakash Thakur son of Late Paras Thakur Resident of village - Mukundpur, Police Station - Mahua, District - Vaishali.

2. Ravindra Prasad Singh son of Bhup Narayan Singh Resident of village - Dighikala (Near Block), Police Station - Hajipur, District - Vaishali.

3. Hari Mohan Ram son of Late Ram Chandra Ram Resident of village - Hariharpur, Police Station - Hajipur, District - Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Binay Kumar, Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Ramji Chaudhary, The Chief Engineer, 2, Rural Works Department, 6th Floor, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Om Prakash Manjhi, The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle, Muzaffarpur.

4. Sri Raghubir Prasad, The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Hajipur.

5. Srimati Rachana Patil, The District Magistrate, Vaishali, Hajipur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukul Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. GA1 S.K. Sharma =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-02-2017 Annexure-E is the decision of the committee, which has considered the claim for regularization and has come to a considered opinion that the petitioners do not complete 240 days for five years, prior to 11.12.1990. Therefore, their claim has been rejected. However, they have sought guidelines from the Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

Patna High Court MJC No.104 of 2016 dt.10-02-2017 2/2 In view of the direction issued by the writ court, this is sufficient compliance of the order.

If the final outcome of the decision, contained in Annexure-E, goes against the interest of these petitioners, they have remedy in law.

Contempt application stands disposed off.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 12.02.2017 Transmission Date