← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36856/2021bail rejected

Dinesh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-02Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36856 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-361 Year-2018 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== DINESH RAM S/o Late Aliyar Ram R/o village- Kurasan, P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar no.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 02-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner who happens to be the step son of the informant is stated to have assaulted and killed his father i.e the husband of the informant It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case due to the informant who happens to be his step mother with the intention to grab the property. There are no eye witness to the occurrence. The father of the petitioner died under suspicious circumstances. There are contradictions in the statement in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36856 of 2021(3) dt.02-02-2022 2/2 F.I.R. and the deposition in course of trial. The petitioner is in custody since 16.8.2018 and has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

A report was called for. As per the report received from the learned trial Court two witnesses have been examined on behalf of the prosecution.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R. and the informant having supported the prosecution case in her deposition in course of trial, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U