← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1636/2015disposed

Asim Hussain v. The Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd. And ORS

2016-05-06Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1636 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Asim Hussain son of Late Kazim Hussain, Resident of- 36, Patliputra Colony, Patna, P.S.- Patliputra, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd. through its Chief Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

2. General Manager (HR), Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna

3. The Managing Director, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

4. Electrical Executive Engineer, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Electric Supply Division, Bhabhua.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Nil ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 06-05-2016 Heard the counsel for petitioner.

The petitioner served the Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited ( for short 'the Company') as Assistant Electrical Engineer and retired from service on 28.2.2010. On his superannuation, the amount under the head Group Saving Scheme was paid to him in August, 2015. The amount under the head General Provident Fund was paid on 15.03.2011. Grievance is that for delayed payment of the amount under the GSS, the petitioner is entitled to interest as per the circular of the Company (Annexure-2) which has not been

Patna High Court CWJC No.1636 of 2015 (5) dt.06-05-2016 2/2 paid. It is also stated that in case of delayed payment of the amount under the head GPF, petitioner is entitled to payment of statutory interest. A representation in this regard was filed which was not considered and examined by the respondents and hence the writ petition.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the application be disposed of permitting the petitioner to make a fresh representation in this regard before the Managing Director of South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited ( respondent no.3) for consideration and disposal in accordance with law. Seen, thus, the writ application is disposed of ermitting the petitioner to file a detailed representation raising the aforesaid grievance before the respondent no.3. If any such representation is filed within three weeks, I am sure the said respondent shall bestow consideration on the application and take appropriate decision in accordance with law as quickly as possible preferably within 06 weeks of such filing/presentation. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U