Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26755 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Manish Kumar S/o Akwal Yadav @ Ramakbal Yadav Resident of Village - Murwariya, P.S. - Pipariya, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 27-04-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and apprehending his arrest in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per FIR, petitioner along with other three named co-accused persons and six unknown persons all residents of village Pipariya Distt. Lakhisarai assaulted informant and his son, while they were returning after attending one yagya on his motorcycle and also alleged to snatch Rs. 20,000/- under life threat showing pistol.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that motorcycle of the petitioner and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26755 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 2/3 informant dashed while they were returning after attending local yagya. It is submitted that out of said accident as informant and his son received minor injuries, taking advantage of same present false case was lodged. It is further submitted that in terms of FIR three known including six unknown persons were involved in assaulting informant and his son, but presence of only one visible injury upon informant and his son making entire occurrence doubtful particularly the manner of assault. It is submitted that upon medical examination injury as received by the informant and his son found simple in nature prima-facie negating intention to cause death. While concluding arguments, it is submitted that above named petitioner is a man of clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.
6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as nature of injury appears simple in nature prima-facie negating intention to cause death, accordingly petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Lakhisarai/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Lakhisarai
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26755 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 3/3 P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482(2) of BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) S.Tripathi/- U T