Md.Ashraf Ali And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9912 of 2008 ======================================================
1. (A) Md. Ashraf Ali (B) Md. Anzar Ali, Both sons of Maulana Ahmad @ Ahmad Ali, resident of village-Bhelahi, P.S.-Mahishi, District- Saharsa. (C) Anwari Begum, wife of Md. Akhtar Hussain, resident of MohallaSaharsa basti, P.S. + District - Saharsa. (D) Athari Begam, wife of Saeed Ahmad, resident of village- Jhagarua, P.S. Jamalpur, District Darbhanga.
(E) Akbari Begam, wife of Md. Abdullah, resident of villageParsawana, P.S.-Nauhatta, District- Saharsa.
2. Shaukat Ali son of Late Abdul Jaleel
3. Ataullah son of Nazuddin, both are resident of village - Bhelahi, P.S.- Mahishi, District- Saharsa.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Land Reforms.
2. The District Collector, Saharsa.
3. The Settlement Officer, Saharsa.
4. The Assistant Settlement Officer, Saharsa.
5. Md. Mustafa
6. Md. Mustaque
7. Abdul Jabbar, all are sons of Late Sheikh Khairul, resident of villageBhelahi, Tola- Bauharwa, P.S.- Mahishi, District - Saharsa. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s : AC to SC-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
10. 24-03-2015 After some argument, learned counsel for petitioners, in presence of learned A.C. to Standing Counsel - 5 as well as learned counsel for private respondents, makes a prayer for disposal of the present petition granting liberty to petitioners to avail appropriate remedy.
The prayer is allowed.
The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to
Patna High Court CWJC No.9912 of 2008 (10) dt.24-03-2015 2/2 petitioners to approach the court of competent jurisdiction. It is made clear that if petitioners file such petition within a period of two months from today, the concerned court may exclude the period consumed in pursuing the present petition i.e. from 09-07-2008 till date, while considering the limitation matter. With above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay/- U