← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41964/2016bail granted

Ranjan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-10Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41964 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -83 Year- 2011 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Ranjan Kumar Singh S/o Late Kamala Prasad Singh R/o Village- Rajur, P.S.- Mali, Dist- Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Aurangabad Town Police Station Case No. 83 of 2011 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467,468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant originally filed complaint case which was converted into police case. The informant alleged that an agent of OCPL company got enrolled his wife in a policy and took Rs.20,000/- as premium but the informant did not get bond of the concerned company and when he made complaint to higher officials, the higher officials did not pay any heed to the request of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41964 of 2016 (6) dt.10-01-2017 2/2 the informant.

Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that petitioner is not an active member of the concerned company and, as a matter of fact, he has been shown as Board of Directors. Moreover, there is nothing on the record to show that any deposit of the informant's wife was taken by the concerned company. It is also submitted that having more or less similar allegation, some co-accused have already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by different Benches of this Court.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the court concerned, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Aurangabad Town Police Station Case no. 83 of 2011, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.K/- U T