Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36853 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-491 Year-2020 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Chandan Kumar Son Of Satendra Kuer Resident Of Village- Pakdi Asli, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

2.

Rahul Kumar Son Of Satendra Kuer Resident Of Village- Pakdi Asli, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

3.

Raju Singh @ Raju Kumar Son Of Awadhesh Singh Resident Of VillagePakdi Asli, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. 4.

Awadhesh Singh Son Of Late Madan Singh Resident Of Village- Pakdi Asli, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Nandan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 447, 323, 427, 436, 307, 148 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have antecedent of one case which was instituted earlier by the present informant.

Taking into consideration the order dated 13.06.2022 in Cr. Misc. No.35119 of 2021 and also the fact that the petitioners are the villagers of the informant and are on an inimical term with the informant from before as the informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36853 of 2021(2) dt.13-06-2022 2/2 earlier had instituted Sahebganj P. S. Case No.298 of 2020 against the present petitioners, as such, the informant took the present case as an opportunity to falsely implicate the present petitioners when they had no concern with Mintu Tiwary or his family members.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Sahebganj P. S. Case No.491 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T