Smt. Lalita Kumari And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1219 of 2014 IN Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 101 of 2005 ===========================================================
1. Smt. Lalita Kumari, D/o Sri Rajendra Prasad Yadav, R/o Village- Sajua, P.O.- Hathiyan, P.S.- Asarganj, District- Munger
2. Smt. Usha Singh, D/o Sri Shiv Kumar Singh, R/o Village/Mohalla- Back of K.N.H. Hostel No. 5, Suraj Mado Path, P.S.- Barari, District- Bhagalpur .... .... Appellants
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The Director (Secondary Education), Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
4. Principal Secretary, General Administration Bihar, Patna
5. Principal Secretary, Law Department-cum-Legal Remembrance, Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellants : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Advocate Mrs. Rubi Rani, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. S.S.P.Yadav, SC-14 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 21-04-2017 A batch of appeals came to be filed against the impugned order passed in M.J.C. No. 101 of 2005 and other analogous cases, which were disposed of on 16.07.2014. Appeals had been moved by some of them and a very detailed order has been passed in L.P.A. No. 1159 of 2014 and other Letters Patent Appeals, disposed of by order dated 21.10.2014. The concluding part of the direction of the Division Bench reads as under: "130. We accordingly allow these
Patna High Court LPA No.1219 of 2014 dt.21-04-2017 2/2 appeals. The order, dated 16.07.2014, passed in M.J.C. No.101 of 2005 and analogous cases, are, therefore, set aside. The orders, passed in contempt applications from time to time by learned single Judge, are hereby held as non est in law."
This appeal also stands disposed of in terms of the above. Nothing more is required to be added beyond what has been concluded above.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Pawan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 21.04.2017 Transmission Date N/A