Ajit Kumar @ Bittu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27485 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2021 Thana- MAIN P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== AJIT KUMAR @ BITTU KUMAR SON OF VIJAY SINGH R/O- VILL-PAI BIGHA, P.S.- MAIN, DIST.- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh Mr. Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 379, 386, 307, 504, 506 of IPC and u/s 27 of Arms Act. Allegedly, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons entered the shop of the informant and started abusing him. It is further alleged that the petitioner took Rs.10,000/- from cash box. The petitioner and other co-accused persons also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27485 of 2022(2) dt.06-09-2022 2/2 assaulted the informant's father and brother. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner has two criminal antecedent, which is also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. This application is accordingly, dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T