Patna High CourtL.P.A/1/2016withdrawn

Most. Shail Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-11The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Navaniti Prasad Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4420 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Most. Shail Devi, wife of Late Kanhaiya Prasad, Resident of village/Mohalla - Bhagwati Nagar, Hari Batika Chowk Town, Bettiah, Police Station - Bettiah Muffasil, District - West Champaran .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Deputy Secretary, Water Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

5. The Under Secretary, Water Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

6. The Chief Engineer, Water Resource Department, Siwan

7. The Chief Engineer, Water Resource Department, Balmiki Nagar

8. The Executive Engineer, Water Resource Department, Saran Canal Division, Gopalganj

9. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kundan Bahadur Singh, SC-22 Mr. Neeraj Kumar, AC to SC-22 Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 11-05-2016 Heard Mr. Rajendra Prasad, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant, and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Standing Counsel No. 22, appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Heard also Mr. Ranjan Kumar,

Patna High Court LPA No.1 of 2016 (4) dt.11-05-2016 2/2 learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the Accountant General. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to make Civil Review Petition of the order impugned in this appeal, if so advised, and also take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the appellant.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the appeal is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the appellant to approach this Court with Civil Review Petition of the order impugned, if so advised, and also take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) Mkr./- U