← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17291/2018bail granted

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Vishwakarma v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-29Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17291 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -526 Year- 2017 Thana -LAHERIMUHALLA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH VISHWAKARMA, Son of Late Rajendra Vishwakarma @ Late Rajendra Mistri, Resident of MohallaMathuriya (Baigani Khand), Police Station- Laheri, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ganesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 750 ML wine is said to have been recovered.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that total 750 ML wine is recovered from co-accused Mukesh Kumar Gupta.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17291 of 2018 (2) dt.29-03-2018 2/2 The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused Mukesh Kumar Gupta. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 526 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T