Harishchandra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15487 of 2014 ====================================================== Harishchandra Thakur son of Sri Deonandan Thakur Resident of VillageHabibhowari P.S.- Bahera, District- Darbhanga. At Present posted as officerin-charge of Police Station- Dumara, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Inspector General of Police, Mujaffarpur, area Mujaffarpur 3.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirhut area, Mujaffarpur 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi 5.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi 6.

The Sub Divisional Police Office, Sadar, Sitamarhi ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate Mr.Ashish Kr. Ranjan, Advocate Mr.Vikash Kr. Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar, AC to GA-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of a writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order No. 331/13 dated 12-3-2013 as passed by Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi in Department Proceeding No. 49 of 2012 and the letter No. 2082 vide order dated 6-9-2013 as passed by Deputy Inspector general of Police, Tirhut area. Mujaffarpur in departmental proceeding No. 49 of 2012 and/or may be pass other and further order

Patna High Court CWJC No.15487 of 2014(2) dt.19-07-2023 2/2 which the petitioner is entitled to."

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only on account of the impugned order dated 12.03.2013, whereby and where under the petitioner had been inflicted punishment of stoppage of one annual increment, his case of promotion was not considered by the respondents, hence they be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of promotion in view of the fact that the effect of the aforesaid punishment order dated 12.03.2013 has already stood exhausted. The learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that in case the case of the petitioner for grant of promotion has not been considered till date, the same shall definitely be considered, forthwith. It is directed accordingly. The present writ petition stands disposed off. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U