← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/24693/2013dismissed

Jay Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-07-06Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24693 of 2013 ====================================================== Jay Ram Singh S/O Sri Dineswar Singh Resident Of Chandanpura, P.STilautha, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Central Selection Board Constable, Bihar Computer Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Patna Through Its Secretary.

4.

The Chairman, Central Selection Board, Constable, Computer Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Patna, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sushil Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rajeshwar Singh- GA 10 For C.S.B.C.

:

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate :

Mr. Binod Kr. Mishra, Advocate :

Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-07-2023 1.

The present petition has been filed seeking the following relief :- "(i) For issuance of appropriate writ, order, direction to the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner on the post of Constable under General Category against the Advertisement no. 1/2012, published by the respondent no.4"

2.

The learned counsel appearing for the Central Selection Board of Constables has submitted by referring to the counter affidavit filed in the present case that the petitioner

Patna High Court CWJC No.24693 of 2013 dt.06-07-2023 2/2 being a General Male Non-Home Guard category candidate has secured lesser marks than the last candidate selected in his category. It is further submitted that while the petitioner has secured 186 marks, the cut- off marks in his category is 189 marks, hence, the petitioner has got no case at all for being appointed on the post of Constable since he is having lesser marks in his category than the marks obtained by the last candidate appointed on the post of Constable, in pursuance to the advertisement in question.

3.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the specific averment made by the respondent- Central Selection Board of Constables to the effect that the petitioner has got lesser marks than the cut off marks in his category, I do not find any merit in the present writ petition, hence, the same stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 10.07.2023 Transmission Date NA