Pappu Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27443 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2021 Thana- BHANGWANPUR HAT District- Siwan ====================================================== PAPPU TIWARI SON OF RAM JATAN TIWARI R/O- VILL- ARUWAN, P.S.- BHAGWANPUR HAT, DIST- SIWAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumari Anupam : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ramchandra Singh For the State : Ms. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-10-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 504 and 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, the co-accused Appu Tiwari inflicted a blow of knife on the informant with the intent to kill which hit on the head of the informant causing injury while the petitioner Pappu Tiwari caught hold of the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27443 of 2022(3) dt.10-10-2022 2/2 and also took out Rs. 3,000/- from the pocket of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the informant sustained three injuries caused by hard and blunt substance out of which one injury is grievous in nature. The main allegation of giving blows of knife is against the co-accused. The petitioner is also accused in one more criminal case as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 02.03.2022. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Siwan in connection with Bhangwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 260 of 2021. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) ayush/- U T