Bittu Kumar @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27669 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2019 Thana- AMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== BITTU KUMAR @ VIKASH KUMAR Son of Sri Pannalal Resident of Village - Jaitipur, P.S.- Ghoshi, and Distt.- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avinash Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the informant alleges that his parked car in the night was stolen. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that his name transpired in the confessional statement of Ravi Kant, who disclosed that he along with the petitioner had lifted the car and had kept at Chhotki Math from where the car was recovered. The learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27669 of 2022(2) dt.14-11-2022 2/3 counsel for the petitioner next submits that confessional statement in police custody does not have any evidentiary value, it is also submitted that because of his antecedent the police caught him implicated through Ravi Kant when he has no connection with Ravi Kant.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Amba P.S. Case No. 78 of 2019 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

One of the bailors shall be his father 'Sri Pannalal', Further, in the event, if an application is filed by the Investigating Officer of the case, which was the learned trail court bringing to its notice that the petitioner after his release on anticipatory bail is not co-operating in the investigation the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27669 of 2022(2) dt.14-11-2022 3/3 learned trial court shall forthwith cancel his bail bonds after recording reasons.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T