Anand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32995 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-685 Year-2018 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Anand Kumar, S/o-Harivansh Sao Resident of village Pandaul, P.S Shakurabad, Distt-Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nityanand Neeraj For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the allegation is of recovery of 15.75 litres of liquor from Gautam Kumar and 10.5 litres of liquor from Md. Jahid.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32995 of 2024(2) dt.07-05-2024 2/3 came to be implicated based on the confessional statement of apprehended accused in police custody, which does not have any evidentiary value. It is also submitted that police, taking advantage of the antecedent of the petitioner, got him implicated through the apprehended accused persons.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Court Excise No.II, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P. S. Case No.685 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32995 of 2024(2) dt.07-05-2024 3/3 it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than three cases, in that event, the present anticipatory bail application shall not be given effect to.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T