Sita Devi @ Sita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.419 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4254 of 2025 ====================================================== Sita Devi @ Sita Kumari, Wife of Akhilesh Kumar, Resident of Village and P.O- Phulari, P.S- Sandesh, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara.
3.
The District Program Officer (Establishment), Ara. 4.
The Block Education Officer, Sandesh, Bhojpur. 5.
The Panchayat Secretary, Panchayat Niyojan Ekayi, Gram Panchayat at Khandol, District- Bhojpur at Ara.
6.
Sushma Kumari Wife of Vimal Kumar Singh, Resident of Ward No.-12, Phulari, P.S- Sandesh District- Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Amritanshu Raj, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 Mr. Abhinav Alok, AC to AAG-13 For Respondent No. 6 :
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-03-2026 This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed by the appellant Sita Devi @ Sita Kumari challenging the order dated 18.03.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4254 of 2025.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has not been paid her salary since 2023 and therefore, necessary direction may be issued. However, after arguing for
Patna High Court L.P.A No.419 of 2025(7) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 some time when a question was posed to him that how the appellant is entitled to get her salary in the writ petition which was filed by Respondent No. 6 challenging her transfer order, at this stage, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this Letters Patent Appeal with liberty to approach the learned Single Judge by filing a writ petition seeking appropriate relief.
3. Accordingly, the Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of as not pressed with the liberty as aforesaid.
4. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ) (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) P.K.P./- U