Patna High CourtCWJC/83/2016dfd for non appearance

Deo Narayan Mandal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-10Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.83 of 2016 ====================================================== Deo Narayan Mandal, aged about 58 years, son of Sonelal Mandal, Resident of Village- Lalpatti, P.O.- Kataiya Manhe, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Public Works Department (P.W.D.), Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Chief Engineer-cum-Additional Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary of P.W.D., Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Collector, Supaul

4. The Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Supaul

5. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Supaul

6. The Sub Divisional Officer, P.W.D., Pipra, Supaul

7. The Sub Divisional Officer, Supaul

8. The Cirlce Officer, Pipra, District- Supaul

9. The Cirlce Officer, Kishanpur, District- Supaul

10. The Circle Officer, Supaul, District- Supaul

11. The Officer Incharge, Pipra Thana, District- Supaul

12. Jogi Mandal, S/o Late Chhedi Mandal

13. Bhogi Lal Mandal, S/o Late Chhedi Mandal

14. Rajendra Mandal, S/o Late Chhedi Mandal Sl. No. 12 to 14 are Residents of Village- Keshav Nagar, Pathra, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitionern : None For the State : Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, AC to GA-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 10-03-2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the impugned notice dated 16.02.2015 as contained in Annexure-10 has already been withdrawn by the Assistant Engineer, Road Construction Department and as such, this writ application has become infructuous.

Patna High Court CWJC No.83 of 2016 (5) dt.10-03-2016 2/2 It is also contended that in view of the direction contained in the order dated 04.02.2016 passed in C.W.J.C. no. 6142/15 by a Division Bench of this Court, Encroachment case no. 1 of 2013-14 has already been initiated against the petitioner and others.

A copy of the order dated 25.02.2015 withdrawing the impugned notice is produced at the time of hearing which is kept on record.

Be that as it may, since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, this writ application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) rinkee/- U