Amiruddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18008 of 2014 =========================================================== Amiruddin Ansari S/o late Md. Isha Momin, R/o Village Behta, PO & PSBenipatti, Distt- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Joint Secretary (Vigilence), Deptt. HRD, Information Bhawan, 4th Floor, Baily Road, Patna

4. D.D.C. Madhubani, Distt Madhubani

5. District Magistrate, Madhubani, Distt- Madhubani

6. D.E.O. Madhubani, Distt- Madhubani

7. Bihar State Madersa Education Board, Patna through its Chairman

8. The Chairman, Bihar State Madersa Education Board, Patna

9. The Secretary, Bihar State Madersa Education Board, Patna

10. Abdul Khalique S/o Late Md. Habib Ansari, Secretary, Madersa Seratul Muslemin Bheta, PO & PS- Benipatti, Distt- Madhubani .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Md. Aslam Ansari, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambastha, G.P.14 For Madarsa Board :

Md. Rashid Alam, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-02-2016 If petitioner claims that the Madarsa which has been given recognition by the Madarsa Board is a fake institution, let him get appropriate declaration in this regard from a civil court of competent jurisdiction and this can only be done after taking evidence etc. with regard to such assertion. A summary proceeding is not the answer for such relief.

Writ application is dismissed with liberty as above. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) Sanjay/- U