Rakesh Ranjan v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50340 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -181 Year- 2016 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Rakesh Ranjan son of Late Ashok Kumar Mishra, Resident of Village - Mau, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sahdeo Mishra son of Hari Mohan Mishra, Resident of Village - Sherpur, P.S. - Maner, District - Patna.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Kr. Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.B. Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation is that the accused persons including the petitioner fraudulently and dishonestly defalcated huge amount of the college.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner was the Secretary General of the Trust, which was taking care of the Institution in question.
The complainant/informant was the Principal of the college appointed
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50340 of 2016 (3) dt.13-01-2017 2/2 by the governing body of the Trust from 2006 to 1.7.2015. The amount which was given by the government to the trust is for period of 2004-2010. The said period was given to the Institution in the year 2013 and the same was disbursed by the complainant/informant in the year 2014. As far as the petitioner is concerned, he had no role to play. He was not the disbursing Officer of the amount in question. The other co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr.Misc.No.51209 of 2016 and Cr.Misc.No.46892 of 2016.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. IX, Gaya in connection with Tekari (Mau) P.S. case No.181 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T