← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30182/2026bail granted

Raghu Yadav @ Rajan Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-11Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30182 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2026 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Raghu Yadav @ Rajan Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar, Son of Krishna Dev Rai, Resident of Village-Korbadha, P.S.- Samastipur Muffasil, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhav Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The accused/petitioner is not named in the FIR and apprehending his arrest in connection with Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No.40 of 2026 registered under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in short 'B.N.S.').

3. As per FIR, on intervening night of 30.01.2026, some unknown persons committed theft in the house of the informant and stolen cable and goods related with electric wiring worth of Rs.3,45,000/- and golden and silver ornaments along with steel utensils worth of Rs.3,00,000/-.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30182 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for petitioner that during the course of investigation, one witness namely, Pawan Kumar, claimed himself as an eyewitness of the occurrence stated that this petitioner along with one another person namely, Rajan Kumar were found roaming near to the house of the informant. It is pointed out that only with this much suspicion, the petitioner was implicated with present case, who is otherwise a man of clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as petitioner prima facie appears implicated with present crime in question for the reason that he was witnessed roaming near to the house of the informant, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, who is a man of clean antecedent, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30182 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 3/3 learned A.C.J.M.-II, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No.40 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'CrPC')/under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short 'BNSS').

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Sanjeet/- U T