← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/24443/2013disposed

Amrendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-04-22Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24443 of 2013 ====================================================== Amrendra Singh son of Late Harbachan Singh resident of villageLasamipur, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Katihar

3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Katihar

4. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Katihar

5. The Block Development Officer cum Executive Officer, Barari

6. Pramukh, Barari Block

7. Parwati Devi father name not known to the petitioner resident of villageBisanpur, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar Panchayat Samiti Area No.. 18

8. Uday Kumar Mandal Father's name not known the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 29 resident of village-Kawar P.S. District-Katihar

9. Ranjit Yadsi father name not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 25, resident of village-Sakarli, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar

10. Rajendra Mandal father's name not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 17 resident of village-Bisanpur, P.S. Barari, DistrictKatihar

11. Ajay Payer Singh father name not known to the petitioner Panchayati Samiti Area No. 24 resident of village-Semapur, P.S. Barari, DistrictKatihar

12. Mafajal Mursai father's name not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 27 resident of village-Sukhasan P.S. District-Katihar

13. Furkun Nisa fathers name not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 28 resident of village-Sukhason P.S. Barari, District-Katihar

14. Nuratan Khatton father's name not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 30 resident of village-Bainsa Govindpur, PS Barari, District-Katihar

15. Parbeen Khatoon father's name not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 31 resident of village-Baisa, Gobindpur, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar

16. Nirmal Devi father's name not known to the petitoienr Panchayat Samiti Area No. 26 resident of village-Durgapur, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar

17. Anjali Devi father's name not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 14 resident of village-Suzapur, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar

18. Nina Devi, W/o not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 2 resident of village-Bdivadara, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar

19. Rekha Devi, W/o not known to the petitioner Panchayati Samiti Area No. 5 resident of village-Barinagar, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar

20. Kaishri Kumar father's name not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 4 resident of village-Gurn Bazar, P.S. Barari, DistrictKatihar

21. Ashok Kumar Chaudhari Fathers's name not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 33 resident of village-Area No. 6, resident of village-East Bari Nagar, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar

Patna High Court CWJC No.24443 of 2013 (3) dt.22-04-2016

22. Kundan Kumar Father's name not known to the petitioner Panchayat Samiti Area No. 6 resident of village-East Bari Nagar, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 22-04-2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Counsel for the State and Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha, counsel for the private respondents have appeared and submit that by the announcement of fresh Panchayat Election-2016 the matter has been rendered infructuous inasmuch as the petitioner, an Ex Up-Pramukh of Panchayat Samiti, Barari in the District of Katihar has raised his grievance against the 'No Confidence Motion' passed against him in the year 2013. It is submitted that since the fresh elections have already been announced hence the issue raised has become academic and considering the submissions, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous by passage of time.

(Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U