Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26273/2025dismissed

Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-06Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26273 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2024 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== Amit Kumar Son of Prakash Paswan R/O Vill- Sarari, P.S.- Jamui, DistrictJamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Umesh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 434 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 238, 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution story, both Shubham Kumar (deceased) and Khushi Kumari used to attend the same coaching institute at Jamui. On 10.07.2024, the mobile of Shubham Kumar was switched off and their common friend Sweta Kumari made a call to the deceased's father informing him that he was in a relationship with Khushi Kumari and Shubham Kumar may be killed. The father and uncle of the deceased started searching for Shubham Kumar who finally was found in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26273 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 a Sarari pond.

4. During the investigation, it has come that the petitioner and others have brutally killed the deceased only because of a love affair. The petitioner is said to have assaulted the victim after he was strangulated. The Post-mortem report also supports the prosecution case. The petitioner is in custody since 15.07.2024.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the nature of the accusation, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

6. The learned counsel for the informant undertakes to produce the witnesses in the trial and will not delay the trial.

7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby dismissed. If the trial is delayed by the prosecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T