Md. Nazir v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28009 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-550 Year-2025 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Nazir Son of Md. Naushad Resident of Mohalla - Sbzibagh, Chambal Ghati Hotel Gali, P.S.- Pirbahore, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mahtab Alam, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 550 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 303(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) , 317(4), 317(5), 111(3), 111(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the police received an information that a woman had fallen from a tempo. Upon reaching the spot, the police were informed that four persons were travelling in the tempo and had allegedly attempted to snatch her jewellery, and on this, she jumped down from the tempo. It is further alleged that the petitioner was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28009 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026 2/3 apprehended on the spot by members of the public and a mobile phone was recovered from his possession.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner was apprehended by members of the public and not by the police. It is further submitted that the informant has not identified the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that save and except a mobile phone, no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 05.07.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class-XV in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28009 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026 3/3 Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 550 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T