Sanoj @ Sanoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29968 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2015 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Sanoj @ Sanoj Yadav Son of Anil Yadav Resident of Village and P.O- Sadhua, P.SRangra O.P, Dist- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 172 of 2024 arising out of Gopalpur (Rangra) P.S. Case No. 231 of 2015 dated 26.10.2015 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 341, 323, 307, 363, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the co-accused persons along with six unknown miscreants are alleged to have abused and assaulted and fired on the informant with intention to kill.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case during the course of investigation. Learned counsel has further submitted that the charge has already been framed in this case. The informant sustained one injury which is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29968 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/2 simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance as stated in para 10 of the bail petition. The petitioner is accused in eight other criminal cases and he is on bail in all the cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 25.04.2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhagalpur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 172 of 2024 arising out of Gopalpur (Rangra) P.S. Case No. 231 of 2015, with the condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T