Feku Ravidas @ Feku Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28246 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2025 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Feku Ravidas @ Feku Das Son of Prasad Ravidas @ Prasad Das Resident of Village- Samir Takiya, P.S.- Rampur, District- Gaya Jee. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.1202 of 2025, arising out of Rampur P.S. Case No.47 of 2025 registered for the offence under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 117(2), 74, 109(1), 352, 351(2), 351 and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3.

Fifteen persons including the petitioner are named in the F.I.R. The petitioner is alleged to be the main assailant, who is said to have hit the deceased with stone. 4.

The petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2025 having clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28246 of 2026(3) dt.02-07-2026 2/3 5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. He further submits that from the postmortem report, it appears that the deceased had sustained only one injury but no fracture has been detected in the postmortem report. 6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the deceased had died after 12 days of the alleged occurrence and therefore, the offence under section 103 of the B.N.S. is not made out against the petitioner. 7.

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail. 8.

I have considered the submissions of the parties.

9.

Considering the postmortem report of the deceased and also the fact that the deceased died after 12 days of alleged occurrence together with the custody of the petitioner, which is from 04.07.2025, this bail application is allowed. 10.

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, XVI, Gaya ji / concerned Court below, in connection with Sessions Trial No.1202 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28246 of 2026(3) dt.02-07-2026 3/3 2025, arising out of Rampur P.S. Case No.47 of 2025, subject to the condition that he will cooperate in the trial and will appear himself or through his advocate on each and every date fixed in the trial. Failure to appear in the trial on two consecutive dates, will result in cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner by the Court below.

11.

It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T