Shivnath Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31255 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-262 Year-2017 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Shivnath Mahto Son of Dipti Mahto Resident of Newaji Tola, Dharmsala, P.S.- Chapra, Distt.- Saran, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the I.P.C. and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and allegation is of recovery of 565 litres of liquor from possession of Munna Rai, 460 litres of liquor from Bittu Rai, 425 litres of liquor from Dhanu Rai and 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from named accused persons and the petitioner is not the owner of the seized motorcycle and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of apprehended accused in police custody, which does not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31255 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 2/2 have any evidentiary value.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No.262/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
6. It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than two cases, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T