Surendra Mehta v. Yogendra Mehta

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.577 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Surendra Mehta son of Late Atwari Mehta, resident of Ward No. 4, P.S. & District- Madhepura .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Yogendra Mehta son of Late Atwari Mehta, resident of villageGaneshpur, P.O. & P.S.- Puraini, District- Madhepura, at present Madhepura Ward No. 04, P.O., P.S. and District- Madhepura .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER 05-05-2016 After some argument Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since Sub Judge-I Madhepura, has no jurisdiction and in view of definition of court as defined under Section 2(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The District Judge has jurisdiction therefore he may permitted to withdraw with this writ application for filing appropriate application before the court defined under Section 2(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Accordingly, this writ application is permitted to be withdrawn.

Thus, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) siddharth/- U