Pappu Pandey @ Arun Prakash Pandey And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42586 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2015 Thana -GOVINDGANJ DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Pappu Pandey @ Arun Prakash Pandey son of Dhurb Pandey

2. Aditya Prakash @ Aditya Prakash Pandey son of Pappu Pandey @ Arun Prakash Pandey both are residents of Village - Sangrampur Mathiya, P.S. Sangrampur, District - East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406/420/323/504/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner No.1 Pappu Pandey is that he took Rs.2,50,000/- from the complainant for managing government job. There is no allegation against petitioner No.2 Aditya Prakash.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the complainant himself indulge in illegal act of managing backdoor entry in the job. There is no evidence of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42586 of 2017 (2) dt.21-09-2017 P2/ payment of such a huge amount with the petitioner. Finding substance in the submission aforesaid, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran/successor Court in connection with Trial No.5376 of 2015, arising out of Govind Ganj Police Station Case No. 44 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T