← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37252/2021bail granted

Jay Prakash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-28Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37252 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2020 Thana- LAURIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== JAY PRAKASH YADAV Son of Shri Umesh Yadav Resident of Village - Nawaka Parau Tola, Police Station - Lauriya, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Pammi Devi Wife of Jay Prakash Yadav, Daughter of Rabindra Yadav Resident of Village - Nawaka Parau Tola, Police Station - Lauriya, District - West Champaran, at present residing at Village - Donwar Kala, Police Station - Yogapatti, District - West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sachida Nand Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Singh, APP For the O.P. No.2 :

Mr. Aditya Nath, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498(A) and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It is a case of cruelty subjected to the Opposite Party No.2 due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand of Rs.2,00,000/-. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37252 of 2021(6) dt.28-07-2022 2/2 further submits that spouse asserted that they are presently living together with love and affection and there is no dispute at present. There is no grievance between them.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Bettiah, District-West Champaran in connection with Lauria P.S. Case No. 219 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T