Krishna Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25186 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2018 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== KRISHNA YADAV Son of Jairam Yadav Resident of Village - Tadila, P.S.- Hasanpura, Distt - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar Tondon For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent, not named in the F.I.R. and has been falsely implicated. He submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and no T.I. Parade has been done till date. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.11.2018.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25186 of 2019(5) dt.27-06-2019 2/2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Harsidhi Police Station Case No. 236 of 2018, subject to the conditions:

(I) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(II) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below. (III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T