Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11272/2018bail granted

Rahul Ranjan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-27Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11272 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2017 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur ======================================================

1. Rahul Ranjan,

2. Santosh Kumar @ Bhupendra Kumar, Both sons of Ram Sharan Ray, Resident of Village- Deodha, Ward No.- 8, P.S.- Hasanpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI HUMAYOU AHMAD KHAN CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Hasanpur P. S. Case No. 169 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 224, 225, 323, 324, 353, 427, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the informant being Police Officer along with other police personnel came to the residence of the petitioner no. 1 in connection with Manjhaul O.P. P. S. Case no. 109 of 2017 under Sections 498A,566/34 of the Indian Penal Code

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11272 of 2018(2) dt.27-02-2018 2/3 and arrested the petitioner no. 1 then the petitioner no. 1 and others entered in altercation with the Police personnel and the petitioner no. 1 fled away. Petitioner no. 2 was assisting in freeing petitioner no. 1.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner no. 1 has brought his wife after giving undertaking in the court and then the Police came to arrest him and when he narrated the entire things but the Police party were adamant to arrest petitioner no. 1 and then the petitioner no. 1 tried to convince them but they took away the wife of petitioner no. 1 at the instance of the uncle of the wife of the petitioner no. 1. No offence as alleged is made out and entire allegations are baseless and concocted.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of pre-arrest bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioners above named, in case of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. III, Rosera at Samastipur in connection with Hasanpur P. S. Case No. 169 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11272 of 2018(2) dt.27-02-2018 3/3 Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T